ITSA told a federal court it remains concerned CBP lacks an active path for IEEPA tariff refunds to sureties who paid after importer default. Education only — not legal advice.
Last verified: September 30, 2026 (PT)
When an importer defaults on U.S. Customs duties, a customs surety may pay CBP under the bond. If those duties later become refundable — as with court-driven IEEPA duty refunds — the practical question: who gets the money back?
Verify at source / not legal advice. Industry education from dated public pages and filings. It does not decide refund eligibility, invent outcomes, or advise any importer, broker, or surety. Confirm CBP, counsel, and the live docket.
On September 28, 2026, InsideTrade reported that U.S. Customs and Border Protection has “assured” the International Trade Surety Association (ITSA) it plans to refund bond issuers for IEEPA tariffs they paid in place of importers that defaulted on entry fees — but that ITSA is still “concerned” CBP is not actively developing a system to make those payments, and that ITSA told a federal judge as much last week.
Pending — paywall: Only the public teaser was retrieved. Full InsideTrade body requires a subscription; treat deeper detail as unverified.
CBP’s IEEPA Duty Refunds page and CAPE information notice describe CAPE (Consolidated Administration and Processing of Entries) in the ACE portal as the electronic path for valid IEEPA refund requests authorized by court order or applicable law.
Per those primary materials:
Cargo Systems Messaging Service (CSMS #68340863, April 2026 CAPE Phase 1 guidance) separately instructs IORs and brokers: do not submit a CAPE Declaration for entries on which a surety paid IEEPA duties in whole or in part.
That instruction is a filing exclusion, not a published surety-refund workflow inside CAPE.
The regulation ITSA cites provides, in substance, that refunds of excessive duties, taxes, fees, or interest are certified for payment to the importer of record unless (among other listed exceptions) a surety submits evidence of payment to Customs, upon default of the principal, of amounts previously determined due on the same entry or transaction. In that case, the refund is certified to that surety up to the amount it paid, or applied to other obligations of the surety.
Whether any surety meets the evidence test on any entry — and how CBP operationalizes it inside or outside CAPE — is not decided here.
Pending: Any later CBP CSMS, CAPE phase, or court order adding a live surety claim path or confirming automated exclusion of surety-paid entries.
ITSA’s public September 3, 2026 amicus brief in Freestyle World, Inc. v. United States (Ct. Int’l Trade) — consistent with the InsideTrade teaser — claims (ITSA’s framing): members have paid millions in IEEPA tariffs after nonpayment; CAPE Phase 1 did not include sureties as filers; CBP has not advised whether surety refunds will appear in a CAPE phase or separate process; sureties supply surety-paid entry lists monthly but lack confirmation of removal from CAPE; and ITSA asks for a “Surety Paid” validation message, Phase 3 limits, or written exclusion confirmation. Those are party filings, not findings that IEEPA refunds were misdirected.
Verify at source / not legal advice / not placement advice. Summarized from dated public pages and filings as of September 30, 2026 (PT). Do not treat association requests or an InsideTrade teaser as a CBP eligibility grant.